快速导航×

ChatGPT评21世纪最伟大运动员:博尔特第1,梅西第3,C罗第4(ChatGPT评选21世纪最杰出运动员:博尔特夺魁,梅西第3,C罗第4)2026-01-17

Clarifying user intent

The user shared a ranking in Chinese, stating Bolt is 1st, Messi is 3rd, and Cristiano Ronaldo is 4th among the greatest athletes of the 21st century. It seems they might want confirmation, context, or my opinion on this. Since they didn't ask a direct question, I should seek clarification on what they want — verification, the full list, or a discussion. I also want to mention that my rankings are not official and can be subjective.Providing response options

se

This situation isn't straightforward. I can respond without browsing, aiming to avoid misinformation. I should state I can't verify the headline without a source and ask for a link. Then, I can provide balanced options by mentioning typical athlete names like Usain Bolt, Serena Williams, and others, while keeping it concise. I can ask if the user wants me to fact-check or share my own top ten criteria. Finally, I’ll confirm I can't verify an official list from ChatGPT as news outlets might publish prompts.Generating options and perspectives

rward

I think it’s reasonable to say Bolt could top a 21st-century athlete list due to his dominance and world records, while Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo are usually near the top. However, others might argue for Michael Phelps or Serena Williams as contenders. I should ask if the user wants me to fact-check the headline or create a ranking with clear criteria. To keep it concise, I can offer a quick top-10 suggestion too. I'll present options in Chinese, since the user wrote in that language.

due

你这条更像是媒体标题党。ChatGPT本身没有“官方榜单”,通常是有人用提示词让 ChatGPT 生成一份榜单,然后媒体拿来当“ChatGPT评选”。是否真有这份具体排名、完整名单和时间点,需要看原文链接才能核实。

要不要我帮你:

nse

  1. 追溯来源并核实真伪与完整榜单;
  2. 基于明确标准(统治力、含金量、纪录、 longevity、跨界影响力)给出一份可解释的21世纪运动员前十并简评;
  3. 比较“博尔特 vs 费尔普斯/小威/三巨头/梅西C罗”的位置争议点?

简单看法:把博尔特排很靠前并不离谱(短时间统治+世界纪录+全球影响力),但很多严肃榜单会把小威、费尔普斯、网球三巨头之一放到前二。梅西/C罗通常都在前五附近。你更关心核实还是想看一版“可复现标准”的榜单?